Hello,
I don't quite understand what I could get from caching with proxy_cache vs serving static files directly.
Everywhere people tend to say that it is better to cache, but isn't caching the same as serving directly from static file ?
Say that I serve home.html from a plain static html file, would I get any benefit to use reverse proxy + cache to serve it ?
Thanks,
I don't quite understand what I could get from caching with proxy_cache vs serving static files directly.
Everywhere people tend to say that it is better to cache, but isn't caching the same as serving directly from static file ?
Say that I serve home.html from a plain static html file, would I get any benefit to use reverse proxy + cache to serve it ?
Thanks,